I. Use IP in derivations for the following problems:
A. Derive P v ~P from scratch
1. ~(P v ~P) Assumption
2. ~P & ~~P 1, DM
3. P v ~P 1-2, IP
B. Derive P -> P from scratch
1. ~(P -> P) Assumption
2. ~(~P v P) 1, Impl.
3. ~~P & ~P 2, DM
4. P -> P 1-3, IP
C. Derive ~(P -> Q) from
1. P & ~Q Premise
2. P -> Q Assumption
3. ~Q & P 1, Comm.
4. ~Q 3, Simp.
5. ~P 2, 4, MT
6. P 1, Simp.
7. P & ~P 5, 6, Conj.
8. ~(P -> Q) 2-7, IP
D. Without using De Morgan's Theorems (DM), derive ~(P v Q)
from
1. ~P Premise
2. ~Q Premise
3. P v Q Assumption
4. Q 1, 3, DS
5. Q & ~Q 2, 4, Conj.
6. ~(P v Q) 3-5, IP
E. Without using De Morgan's Theorems (DM), derive (~P v ~Q)
-> ~(P & Q) from scratch. (Hint: use an in indirect proof
inside of a conditional proof.)
1. ~P v ~Q Assumption
2. P & Q Assumption
3. P 2, Simp.
4. ~~P 3, DN
5. ~Q 1, 4, DS
6. Q & P 2, Comm.
7. Q 6, Simp.
8. Q & ~Q 5, 7, Conj.
9. ~(P & Q) 2-8, IP
10. (~P v ~Q) -> ~(P & Q) 1-9, CP